The Costs of Empire: Can We Really Afford 1,000 Overseas Bases?

The Costs of Empire: Can We Really Afford 1,000 Overseas Bases? | ForeignPolicy | AlterNet

The Costs of Empire: Can We Really Afford 1,000 Overseas Bases?

By David Vine, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted March 10, 2009.

Our overseas military bases are pushing the nation deeper into debt and making the United States and the planet less secure.
Tools
email EMAIL
print PRINT
82 COMMENTS

Share and save this post:





Share on Facebook

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Also in ForeignPolicy

Compañero Obama? Obama Mends Fences with Latin America
Benjamin Dangl

Why Wiping Out Insurgents Won't Bring Peace to Sri Lanka
Mitu Sengupta

Defying the Economic Odds: The World Melts Down, China Grows
Dilip Hiro

Boycott Begins to Bite at Companies Supporting Israel's Military Occupation of Palestine
Nadia Hijab

The Ugly Truth About Foreign Aid in Afghanistan: Kabul's New Elite
Patrick Cockburn

Don't Be Fooled by the Taliban Hysteria in Pakistan: They Aren't Going to Take Over
Pepe Escobar
More stories by David Vine

RSS icon ForeignPolicy RSS Feed

RSS icon Main AlterNet RSS Feed
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg
Digg
What is Digg?

* 60 diggs
Is a Cheney Cover-Up Scandal Brewing?

On April 21, Philip Zelikow, who was counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during the Bush administration, revealed on Foreign Policy's "Shadow Government" blog that he wrote a memo in 2005 disputing the conclusions of Bush Justice Department lawyers that torture was legal.
* 44 diggs
40 Million Nonbelievers in America? The Secret Is Almost Out

Secularists have very quietly become one of America’s largest minorities -- how long before they use their power?
* 25 diggs
Memo to Jackass, Don't Stand Up for Credit Card Industry

A columnist, (Michael Hiltzik, Los Angeles Times) decides the credit card industry is a victim of "public anger" --- how revolting is that?
* 21 diggs
Limbaugh's $400 Million, Even Match of Clear Channel Layoffs

The astronomical worth of Limbaugh's eight-year pact: $400 million. The amount of money Clear Channel execs have been trying to scrimp and save this year as they lay off thousands from the struggling company: $400 million. Ironic, don't you think?
* 19 diggs
Filibustering - Just how much it matters may shock you

"The word filibuster doesn't appear in any of our founding documents. How on earth did this take control of the legislative process?" This article clearly explains the history and significance of Senate floor filibustering in America.

Powered by Digg's Users
Advertisement

In the midst of an economic crisis that's getting scarier by the day, it's time to ask whether the nation can really afford some 1,000 military bases overseas. For those unfamiliar with the issue, you read that number correctly. One thousand. One thousand U.S. military bases outside the 50 states and Washington, DC, representing the largest collection of bases in world history.

Officially the Pentagon counts 865 base sites, but this notoriously unreliable number omits all our bases in Iraq (likely over 100) and Afghanistan (80 and counting), among many other well-known and secretive bases. More than half a century after World War II and the Korean War, we still have 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan, and 87 in South Korea. Others are scattered around the globe in places like Aruba and Australia, Bulgaria and Bahrain, Colombia and Greece, Djibouti, Egypt, Kuwait, Qatar, Romania, Singapore, and of course, Guantánamo Bay, Cuba -- just to name a few. Among the installations considered critical to our national security are a ski center in the Bavarian Alps, resorts in Seoul and Tokyo, and 234 golf courses the Pentagon runs worldwide.

Unlike domestic bases, which set off local alarms when threatened by closure, our collection of overseas bases is particularly galling because almost all our taxpayer money leaves the United States (much goes to enriching private base contractors like corruption-plagued former Halliburton subsidiary KBR). One part of the massive Ramstein airbase near Landstuhl, Germany, has an estimated value of $3.3 billion. Just think how local communities could use that kind of money to make investments in schools, hospitals, jobs, and infrastructure.

Even the Bush administration saw the wastefulness of our overseas basing network. In 2004, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced plans to close more than one-third of the nation's overseas installations, moving 70,000 troops and 100,000 family members and civilians back to the United States. National Security Adviser Jim Jones, then commander of U.S. forces in Europe, called for closing 20% of our bases in Europe. According to Rumsfeld's estimates, we could save at least $12 billion by closing 200 to 300 bases alone. While the closures were derailed by claims that closing bases could cost us in the short term, even if this is true, it's no reason to continue our profligate ways in the longer term.

Costs Far Exceeding Dollars and Cents

Unfortunately, the financial costs of our overseas bases are only part of the problem. Other costs to people at home and abroad are just as devastating. Military families suffer painful dislocations as troops stationed overseas separate from loved ones or uproot their families through frequent moves around the world. While some foreign governments like U.S. bases for their perceived economic benefits, many locals living near the bases suffer environmental and health damage from military toxins and pollution, disrupted economic, social, and cultural systems, military accidents, and increased prostitution and crime.

In undemocratic nations like Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Saudi Arabia, our bases support governments responsible for repression and human rights abuses. In too many recurring cases, soldiers have raped, assaulted, or killed locals, most prominently of late in South Korea, Okinawa, and Italy. The forced expulsion of the entire Chagossian people to create our secretive base on British Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is another extreme but not so aberrant example.

Bases abroad have become a major and unacknowledged “face” of the United States, frequently damaging the nation's reputation, engendering grievances and anger, and generally creating antagonistic rather than cooperative relationships between the United States and others. Most dangerously, as we have seen in Saudi Arabia and Yemen, and as we are seeing in Iraq and Afghanistan, foreign bases create breeding grounds for radicalism, anti-Americanism, and attacks on the United States, reducing, rather than improving, our national security.

Proponents of maintaining the overseas base status quo will argue, however, that our foreign bases are critical to national and global security. A closer examination shows that overseas bases have often heightened military tensions and discouraged diplomatic solutions to international conflicts. Rather than stabilizing dangerous regions, our overseas bases have often increased global militarization, enlarging security threats faced by other nations who respond by boosting military spending (and in cases like China and Russia, foreign base acquisition) in an escalating spiral. Overseas bases actually make war more likely, not less.

The Benefits of Fewer Bases

This isn't a call for isolationism or a protectionism that would prevent us from spending money overseas. As the Obama administration and others have recognized, we must recommit to cooperative forms of engagement with the rest of the world that rely on diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties rather than military means. In addition to freeing money to meet critical human needs at home and abroad, fewer overseas bases would help rebuild our military into a less overstretched, defensive force committed to defending the nation's territory from attack.

In these difficult economic times, the Obama administration and Congress should initiate a major reassessment of our 1,000 overseas bases. Now is the time to ask if, as a nation and a world, we can really afford the 1,000 bases that are pushing the nation deeper into debt and making the United States and the planet less secure? With so many needs facing our nation, it's unconscionable to have 1,000 overseas bases. It's time to begin closing them.