This Is Change? 20 Hawks, Clintonites and Neocons to Watch for in Obama's White House

This Is Change? 20 Hawks, Clintonites and Neocons to Watch for in Obama's White House | | AlterNet

This Is Change? 20 Hawks, Clintonites and Neocons to Watch for in Obama's White House

By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. Posted November 20, 2008.

A who's who guide to the people poised to shape Obama's foreign policy.
Tools
email EMAIL
print PRINT
427 COMMENTS

Share and save this post:





Share on Facebook

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Our Economy Is Going to Keep Tanking Until We Stop Shoveling Billions to Rich People
Pam Martens

DrugReporter:
There's No Drug Crime Wave at the Border, Just a Lot of Media Hype
Gabriel Arana

Environment:
World's Next Big Climate Pact Begins to Take Shape
Peter N. Spotts

Health and Wellness:
Health Insurance Bankrupts Americans
Deepak Bhargava

Immigration:
Countering the Spin: Earned Legalization Isn't Penalty-Free "Amnesty"
Marc R. Rosenblum

Media and Technology:
Does Obama Want to Replace Your Facebook Profile with Your Social Security Card?
Annalee Newitz

Movie Mix:
Motherhood, Sex, and a Woman's Deepest Fears
Deborah Orr

Politics:
After 100 Days, What Has The Stimulus Accomplished?
Michael Grabell

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
The Tiller Murder Wasn't a Lone Killer's Sick Plot; It Came Out of the Radical Anti-Abortion Movement
Jill Filipovic

Rights and Liberties:
200 Executions and Counting: Texas Gov. Rick Perry's Cruel Death Tally
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Bush-Era Moral Crusaders Still Pushing Marriage on the Rest of Us
Amy DePaul

Take Action:
Slam Bill O'Reilly for His Jihad Against Dr. George Tiller
Isaac Fitzgerald

Water:
Cochabamba: From War to Water Management
Raul Zibechi

World:
The Dark Side of Plan Colombia: How the U.S. is Subsidizing Death and Drug Trafficking on Stolen Lands
Teo Ballvé
More stories by Jeremy Scahill

RSS icon Main AlterNet RSS Feed
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg
Digg
What is Digg?

* 425 diggs
Carbon Capture Can't Make Coal Clean. Period.

WE Energies has proclaimed that it has captured carbon at a coal-fired plant, but this "success" won't come close to making coal clean.
* 39 diggs
Will Your Facebook Profile Become Your New ID?

You heard it here first: The next evolution of identity management in the U.S. will grow out of Facebook. So watch what you out in your profile.
* 38 diggs
Marijuana and Cocaine Should Be Legalized, Says Latin Americ

Marijuana and cocaine for personal use should be decriminalised because the "war on drugs" has been a disaster, according to some of Latin America's most powerful politicians and writers.
* 34 diggs
No More Compromise: Obama Must Reject Bush Dictator Policies

The recent haggling over Guantanamo Bay is such classic Democratic Party politics, it almost makes you want to laugh. Almost, except that it’s, you know, revolting. Eight years of Clintonian squirming was bad enough, but now we have Barack Obama, smoking Habeas Corpus and not inhaling it. Why is the Gitmo decision classic Democratic Party thinking?
* 25 diggs
Why the Pentagon Is Probably Lying Abt Sodomy & Rape Photos

It is very likely that the Pentagon lying. This is probably exactly what the photos show, because it happened. Precisely these exact sex crimes -- these exact images and these very objects - -- are familiar and well-documented to those of us who follow closely rights organizations reports of what has already been confirmed.

Powered by Digg's Users
Advertisement

Click here to view this guide as a single page.

U.S. policy is not about one individual, and no matter how much faith people place in President-elect Barack Obama, the policies he enacts will be fruit of a tree with many roots. Among them: his personal politics and views, the disastrous realities his administration will inherit, and, of course, unpredictable future crises. But the best immediate indicator of what an Obama administration might look like can be found in the people he surrounds himself with and who he appoints to his Cabinet. And, frankly, when it comes to foreign policy, it is not looking good.

Obama has a momentous opportunity to do what he repeatedly promised over the course of his campaign: bring actual change. But the more we learn about who Obama is considering for top positions in his administration, the more his inner circle resembles a staff reunion of President Bill Clinton's White House. Although Obama brought some progressives on board early in his campaign, his foreign policy team is now dominated by the hawkish, old-guard Democrats of the 1990s. This has been particularly true since Hillary Clinton conceded defeat in the Democratic primary, freeing many of her top advisors to join Obama's team.

"What happened to all this talk about change?" a member of the Clinton foreign policy team recently asked the Washington Post. "This isn't lightly flavored with Clintons. This is all Clintons, all the time."

Amid the euphoria over Obama's election and the end of the Bush era, it is critical to recall what 1990s U.S. foreign policy actually looked like. Bill Clinton's boiled down to a one-two punch from the hidden hand of the free market, backed up by the iron fist of U.S. militarism. Clinton took office and almost immediately bombed Iraq (ostensibly in retaliation for an alleged plot by Saddam Hussein to assassinate former President George H.W. Bush). He presided over a ruthless regime of economic sanctions that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and under the guise of the so-called No-Fly Zones in northern and southern Iraq, authorized the longest sustained U.S. bombing campaign since Vietnam.

Under Clinton, Yugoslavia was bombed and dismantled as part of what Noam Chomsky described as the "New Military Humanism." Sudan and Afghanistan were attacked, Haiti was destabilized and "free trade" deals like the North America Free Trade Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade radically escalated the spread of corporate-dominated globalization that hurt U.S. workers and devastated developing countries. Clinton accelerated the militarization of the so-called War on Drugs in Central and Latin America and supported privatization of U.S. military operations, giving lucrative contracts to Halliburton and other war contractors. Meanwhile, U.S. weapons sales to countries like Turkey and Indonesia aided genocidal campaigns against the Kurds and the East Timorese.

The prospect of Obama's foreign policy being, at least in part, an extension of the Clinton Doctrine is real. Even more disturbing, several of the individuals at the center of Obama's transition and emerging foreign policy teams were top players in creating and implementing foreign policies that would pave the way for projects eventually carried out under the Bush/Cheney administration. With their assistance, Obama has already charted out several hawkish stances. Among them:

-- His plan to escalate the war in Afghanistan;

-- An Iraq plan that could turn into a downsized and rebranded occupation that keeps U.S. forces in Iraq for the foreseeable future;

-- His labeling of Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a "terrorist organization;"

-- His pledge to use unilateral force inside of Pakistan to defend U.S. interests;

-- His position, presented before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), that Jerusalem "must remain undivided" -- a remark that infuriated Palestinian officials and which he later attempted to reframe;

-- His plan to continue the War on Drugs, a backdoor U.S. counterinsurgency campaign in Central and Latin America;

-- His refusal to "rule out" using Blackwater and other armed private forces in U.S. war zones, despite previously introducing legislation to regulate these companies and bring them under U.S. law.

Obama did not arrive at these positions in a vacuum. They were carefully crafted in consultation with his foreign policy team. While the verdict is still out on a few people, many members of his inner foreign policy circle -- including some who have received or are bound to receive Cabinet posts -- supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Some promoted the myth that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. A few have worked with the neoconservative Project for the New American Century, whose radical agenda was adopted by the Bush/Cheney administration. And most have proven track records of supporting or implementing militaristic, offensive U.S. foreign policy. "After a masterful campaign, Barack Obama seems headed toward some fateful mistakes as he assembles his administration by heeding the advice of Washington's Democratic insider community, a collective group that represents little 'change you can believe in,'" notes veteran journalist Robert Parry, the former Associated Press and Newsweek reporter who broke many of the stories in the Iran-Contra scandal in the 1980s.